Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Disable referrer tracking by config setting #2094

Closed
peterbo opened this issue Feb 15, 2011 · 10 comments
Closed

Disable referrer tracking by config setting #2094

peterbo opened this issue Feb 15, 2011 · 10 comments
Assignees
Labels
Bug For errors / faults / flaws / inconsistencies etc. duplicate For issues that already existed in our issue tracker and were reported previously.
Milestone

Comments

@peterbo
Copy link
Contributor

peterbo commented Feb 15, 2011

A site admin should be able to disable referrer tracking in the settings menu.

  • a super admin can disable referrer tracking for the whole piwik instance
  • a site admin can disable ref tracking for a single site within a piwik instance
    What does make more sense?

Disabling referrer tracking causes:

  • remove referrer parameters from the tracker
  • UI: disable referrer Widget / menu entry / plugin for the piwik instance / single website
@robocoder
Copy link
Contributor

Why? (isn't it already possible to deactivate the Referers plugin)?

@peterbo
Copy link
Contributor Author

peterbo commented Feb 16, 2011

Good Point Anthon, didn't think of a solution which is so easy. ;) For me, this would be enough and we would not need another level of functionality -> CLOSED.

@mattab
Copy link
Member

mattab commented Feb 17, 2011

Disabling the Referers will not prevent the referer from being saved in the Goal table and Visit table, so it still requires a new setting to disable referer logging completely (ie. remove the urlref and _ref parameters)

@peterbo
Copy link
Contributor Author

peterbo commented Feb 17, 2011

After having a talk again with the person in charge of the piwik study (regarding privacy concerns), we should assure that piwik won't store any referer information after the plugin has been disabled.

@robocoder
Copy link
Contributor

I would like to roll all the privacy recommemdations (#2094 and #2095) and existing features (AnonymizeIP, OptOut, and DoNotTrack) into a single Privacy plugin, consolidating all the related settings into a single Admin screen.

@peterbo
Copy link
Contributor Author

peterbo commented Feb 24, 2011

Good idea. That would increase the usability, comfort and consistency of the privacy configuration by far. +1

@mattab
Copy link
Member

mattab commented Feb 24, 2011

we should do this for 1.2, as it is very simple

@mattab
Copy link
Member

mattab commented Mar 26, 2011

vipsoft, OK for having a single Privacy plugin, with its own Settings page in Piwik. Also we have to expose the anonimize "number of bytes to remove" via the UI rather than the config file. Should we create a ticket?

@robocoder
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, we should have a ticket that consolidates the specs for the new plugin.

With respect to #1552 (admin submenus), where would this fit in the proposed menu hierarchy?

Should we block on #1713 (config class refactoring)? We should remove AnonymizeIP from an existing config.ini.php during the update.

@mattab
Copy link
Member

mattab commented Mar 27, 2011

included this requirement in the new ticket at #2233

for the config file, 1713 is not required because the config file value is used for BC until the UI itself was used to configure. The UI, once it has been submitted once and the value found in option table, is overriding the config file value (I wrote this in the ticket), this is how we handled previous config file to UI conversions.

@peterbo peterbo added this to the Piwik 1.3 milestone Jul 8, 2014
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Bug For errors / faults / flaws / inconsistencies etc. duplicate For issues that already existed in our issue tracker and were reported previously.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants