You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
BugFor errors / faults / flaws / inconsistencies etc.CriticalIndicates the severity of an issue is very critical and the issue has a very high priority.
--- js/piwik.js (revision 4048)
+++ js/piwik.js (working copy)
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@
if (value && typeof value === 'object' &&
typeof value.toJSON === 'function') {
- value = value.toJSON(key);
+ // value = value.toJSON(key);
}
Is it safe to apply in Piwik since we want to be compatible as much as possible, and this case Magento + old prototype represents probably a good number of users.
Is it safe to push this in , or is this code useful?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
BugFor errors / faults / flaws / inconsistencies etc.CriticalIndicates the severity of an issue is very critical and the issue has a very high priority.
The bug is with custom variables and strigification.
To reproduce, this is the code:
The custom vars are then passed as {"1":""C""}
When correct value is: {"1":["U","C"]}
This is known issue and it is working fine when using latest prototype at: https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/prototype/1.7.0.0/prototype.js
The patch is:
Is it safe to apply in Piwik since we want to be compatible as much as possible, and this case Magento + old prototype represents probably a good number of users.
Is it safe to push this in , or is this code useful?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: