Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

integrate MajesticSEO in SEO report #3734

Closed
mattab opened this issue Feb 5, 2013 · 7 comments
Closed

integrate MajesticSEO in SEO report #3734

mattab opened this issue Feb 5, 2013 · 7 comments
Assignees
Labels
Critical Indicates the severity of an issue is very critical and the issue has a very high priority. Enhancement For new feature suggestions that enhance Matomo's capabilities or add a new report, new API etc.
Milestone

Comments

@mattab
Copy link
Member

mattab commented Feb 5, 2013

Add new reports to the SEO widget to make it even more useful!

Typical API response from MajesticSEO is:


{"ResponseCode":"OK","IndexType":"Historic","Data":[{"TrustFlow":"64","ItemType":"RootDomain","ExtBackLinks":"219449160","Item":"piwik.org","Status":"Found","CitationFlow":"72","RefDomains":"88716"}]}

Therefore we could display:

  • External Backlinks
  • Referrer Domains
  • and the 2 custom metrics:
    • Citation flow
    • trust flow

I think we should at least display external backlink+referer domain, and maybe show the trust/citation flow with a tooltip to explain them.

Also, we should consider adding a caching layer on the SEO widget and cache in piwik_option, a given domain stats, for a given day (refresh after 24 hours). This way we will not overload the majestic seo servers, and the widget will be more responsive on refresh.

@anonymous-matomo-user
Copy link

That's great. As you may know, Majestic has two indexes - Historic and Fresh. The Fresh numbers, whilst smaller, are the ones mostly used, because the Historic numbers include a load of dead links etc. My inclination would be to use Fresh - or both. Whichever is used, the user should be able be told onscreen which number it refers to.

@mattab
Copy link
Member Author

mattab commented Feb 7, 2013

Fresh & more accurate data would be preferred, how do we request this data from Fresh instead of Historic indexes?

Proposed spec:

@diosmosis
Copy link
Member

In 513fe7e: Fixes #3734, added 'external backlinks' and 'referrer domains' stats to SEO widget via Majestic SEO API.

@diosmosis
Copy link
Member

In fc578d6: Refs #3734, add tooltip to majestic SEO icon.

@anonymous-matomo-user
Copy link

In 83964a7: Make test more useful.
Hopefully fix test now.

refs #3734

@diosmosis
Copy link
Member

Thanks for the help, Fabian!

@mattab
Copy link
Member Author

mattab commented Mar 29, 2013

In 6684ca2: refs #3734 better integration of Majesticseo.com links

  • linking on metric value
  • Display + linking on "Majestic"

@mattab mattab added this to the 1.12 - The Great 1.x Backlog milestone Jul 8, 2014
@mattab mattab self-assigned this Jul 8, 2014
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Critical Indicates the severity of an issue is very critical and the issue has a very high priority. Enhancement For new feature suggestions that enhance Matomo's capabilities or add a new report, new API etc.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants