Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Make sure Piwik complies with WAA definitions #396

Closed
mattab opened this issue Oct 22, 2008 · 3 comments
Closed

Make sure Piwik complies with WAA definitions #396

mattab opened this issue Oct 22, 2008 · 3 comments
Labels
Bug For errors / faults / flaws / inconsistencies etc. Critical Indicates the severity of an issue is very critical and the issue has a very high priority.
Milestone
0.9.9

Comments

@mattab
Copy link
Member

mattab commented Oct 22, 2008

There are definitions for unique visitors, bounce rate, etc. that Piwik needs to comply to. See the full documentation on http://www.webanalyticsassociation.org/attachments/committees/5/WAA_Web_Analytics_Definitions_20080922_For_Public_Comment.pdf

We need to make sure that Piwik definitions comply to these.
We already know that unique visitors over a week/month/year are not correct (see #5428)
@mattab
Copy link
Member Author

mattab commented Jul 13, 2010

(In [2490]) Refs #396

  • updating exit_rate calculation to have nb of pages view as the denominator, rather than number of visits. Complies with WAA Page Exit Ratio (ie. Exit rate) proposal.

@mattab
Copy link
Member Author

mattab commented Jul 13, 2010

(In [2491]) Refs #396
Referers is actually spelt Referrers. Didn't update all translation keys as it would invalidate all existing translations.

@mattab
Copy link
Member Author

mattab commented Jul 13, 2010

I read the specs and checked that all Piwik metrics comply with the definitions.

I slightly updated the FAQs at http://piwik.org/faq/general/

@mattab mattab added this to the Piwik 0.9.9 - Stable release milestone Jul 8, 2014
@robocoder robocoder mentioned this issue Mar 22, 2010
Closed
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Bug For errors / faults / flaws / inconsistencies etc. Critical Indicates the severity of an issue is very critical and the issue has a very high priority.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
0.9.9
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@mattab